Rhetoric is defined as: “proportion of speaking to the speaker AND audience’s situation or position”; mostly the speaker AND audience from the outside of literary work are desired. Now the problem is how “the proportion of speaking to the situation” had been represented AND mimesis in the innermost layer of the story, in the character’s quotations. Much of the story is shaped by REPRESENTATION of the characters SPEECH forms. Rhetoric of the story requires that the characters in the story, speak according to the speaker, SPEECH AND audience. It is assumed that in this masterpiece, with realistic motivation, character’s SPEECH represent AND mimesis proper to the speaker AND audience’s situation; in comparison with the raw works AND result oriented ones, which considered only outside audience’s situation; also, in the world of story, different characters speak with the same language AND even sometime all in literary ways, same as the poet’s language. In Pir e Changi, rhetoric of the story implies that figures of SPEECH related with God, Omar AND represent AND mimesis according to the speaker, audience AND the topic. The moments of the story, also mimesis by direct SPEECH AND free direct SPEECH in a dramatic way.